Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 政府监视
RF>RF Personal answer不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信 |
经济 › VAT Rates
RF>RF Personal answer减少 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
RF>RF Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
RF>RF Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
外交政策 › 欧洲联盟
RF>RF Personal answer不是,但严格限制迁移到该国,我们货币的捐款的条款重新谈判 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
RF>RF Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
经济 › 国内工作
RF>RF Personal answerYes, an initial 5 year tax break and then gradually enter into regular taxation without a retroactive collection, allowing businesses the time to grow and become profitable. |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 北约
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies |
外交政策 › EU Army
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
RF>RF Personal answer是的,所有人都应获得一份收入以支付包括食物与住房在内的必需品 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Gender Transition
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
外交政策 › 外国选举
RF>RF Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
RF>RF Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
RF>RF Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
RF>RF Personal answer是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
RF>RF Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
经济 › 经济刺激
RF>RF Personal answer是的,但是使用对低收入公民减税的形式 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 以色列
RF>RF Personal answer我们应该给予以色列和巴勒斯坦同样的支持。 |
经济 › 政府支出
RF>RF Personal answer不,增加对富人的税收来替代 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,判处他们终身监禁,且不得假释 |
社会 › Hate Speech
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
社会 › 安乐死
RF>RF Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
科学 › 核能
RF>RF Personal answer是的,暂时性的,同时我们增加投资到更清洁的可再生能源 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
RF>RF Personal answer是的,阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的 |
外交政策 › European Commission
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
RF>RF Personal answer是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
RF>RF Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
RF>RF Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
经济 › 社会福利
RF>RF Personal answer减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人 |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
RF>RF Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
经济 › 关税
RF>RF Personal answer不,全球自由贸易体系对我们的企业和消费者来说更好 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
RF>RF Personal answer是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
RF>RF Personal answer不,仅当他们有滥用药物的犯罪历史时再这么做 |
环境 › Animal Testing
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
移民 › 双重国籍
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 奖金上限
RF>RF Personal answer不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but more priority should be given to food safety and environmental protection |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
RF>RF Personal answer是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
移民 › 公民考试
RF>RF Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
外交政策 › Backstop
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
RF>RF Personal answer我对目前的支出额感到满意 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 北约
RF>RF Personal answer是的,拒绝保卫其他北约国家开创了一个全球力量平衡的危险先例 |
移民 › 技术移民
RF>RF Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
RF>RF Personal answerNo, because every human being needs some sort of shelter and public spaces do not provide that, a hybrid project between the city and the homeless could be the answer to this issue. |
医保 › 大麻
RF>RF Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
RF>RF Personal answer不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源 |
医保 › World Health Organization
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
RF>RF Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › State Ownership
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 22 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.