Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 北约
9>9 Personal answerYes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
外交政策 › 以色列
9>9 Personal answerNo. We should offer humanitarian help for everyone that needs it and play a role in order to stop the war |
外交政策 › 外国选举
9>9 Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在此国家生活10年后 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only provide humanitarian aid |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerNo, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
外交政策 › Backstop
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answerNo, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if they use renewable energy sources |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
Housing › High density residential buildings
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Weapon Sales Ethics
9>9 Personal answerYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations |
外交政策 › Netanyahu Leadership
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › EV Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.