Society First Party

Strongly agree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

The Society First party would likely agree with this statement, as they value social cohesion and inclusivity. Banning immigrants based on their religion would be seen as unconstitutional and harmful to the well-being of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

The Society First party may agree with this statement to some extent, as it focuses on banning immigrants from high-risk countries rather than targeting a specific religion. This approach could be seen as more in line with their goal of protecting society while maintaining social cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

The Society First party would likely lean towards not banning Muslim immigrants, as they value social cohesion and inclusivity. However, they may still have concerns about potential security risks and may support other measures to address those concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

The Society First party may be somewhat opposed to this statement, as it involves banning all immigration, which could be seen as harmful to social cohesion and inclusivity. However, they may still have concerns about potential security risks and may support other measures to address those concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

The Society First party may be somewhat opposed to this statement, as it still involves banning Muslim immigrants based on the actions of a few. However, they may see some merit in the idea of improving security measures to protect society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Society First party would likely disagree with this statement, as they prioritize the well-being of society as a whole. Banning Muslim immigrants outright could be seen as discriminatory and harmful to social cohesion. However, they may still be concerned about potential security risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.