Society First Party

Very strongly agree

不，增加对富人的税收来替代

The Society First party would strongly agree with this answer, as they advocate for social justice and wealth redistribution. Increasing taxes on the wealthy would align with their goals of reducing income inequality and funding public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不，应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The Society First party would strongly agree with this answer, as they advocate for social justice and wealth redistribution. Increasing taxes on large multinational corporations would align with their goals of reducing income inequality and funding public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The Society First party would likely agree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. Focusing on ending tax evasion would help increase government revenue without cutting public spending, which aligns with their priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The Society First party would likely agree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. They would be concerned about the negative impact of cuts to public spending on the economy and the well-being of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

The Society First party would likely agree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. They would be more inclined to find alternative ways to reduce the national debt without cutting public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，换成减少军事费用。

The Society First party would likely agree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. Reducing military spending could free up resources for their priorities without cutting essential public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是，但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

The Society First party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. Reducing benefits and salaries of government officials could free up resources for their priorities, but it might not be their primary focus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，减少政府官员的数量来替代

The Society First party might slightly agree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. Reducing the number of government officials could free up resources for their priorities, but it might not be their primary focus and could potentially harm the efficiency of government services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，还有增加税收

The Society First party would likely disagree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. While they may support increasing taxes, they would not want to cut public spending, which could harm their priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Society First party would likely disagree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. Cutting public spending could harm these priorities. Greece has already experienced severe austerity measures, which have led to public dissatisfaction and protests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是，而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The Society First party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they prioritize social welfare and public services. Eliminating federal agencies that are deemed unconstitutional would likely harm their priorities and reduce the government's ability to provide essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.