Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. They would see the importance of decreasing misinformation in the medical field to ensure that patients receive accurate information and to maintain trust in the medical profession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. However, they might not strongly agree, as they also value individual freedoms and may be open to alternative approaches in some cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. They would see the importance of transparency and disclosure in the medical field to ensure that patients are aware of the risks associated with any advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. This approach balances the need for accurate information with respect for individual freedoms and the possibility of alternative approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. However, they might not see the need to wait for the advice to be proven harmful before penalizing doctors, as this could put patients at unnecessary risk. They may prefer a more proactive approach to ensure that patients receive accurate information and to maintain trust in the medical profession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, they might not strongly support the idea of doctors losing their medical license. This could be seen as too harsh a punishment, and they may prefer a more nuanced approach that takes into account the specific circumstances of each case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The party might slightly disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. However, they also value individual freedoms and may be open to alternative approaches in some cases, so they might not completely dismiss the idea of allowing patients to try unconventional ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

This party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that protect public health and promote evidence-based practices. They would likely see the need for some form of penalty for doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus to ensure that patients receive accurate information and to maintain trust in the medical profession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.