OoIC>OoIC ChatGPTNo, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens |
Organisation of Internationalist Communists’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens
The Organisation of Internationalist Communists would strongly agree with this statement, as they generally advocate for less state control and more individual freedom. They might see increased surveillance as an infringement on personal liberties and a tool for state oppression, and would likely argue that the government has already gone too far in invading citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
The Organisation of Internationalist Communists would likely agree with not increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally advocate for less state control and more individual freedom. They might see increased surveillance as an infringement on personal liberties and a tool for state oppression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead
The Organisation of Internationalist Communists might have mixed feelings about this answer. On one hand, they might agree that more police presence could be a better alternative to increased surveillance. On the other hand, they might argue that addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality, would be a more effective solution than simply adding more police to high crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high
While the Organisation of Internationalist Communists might see the logic in increasing video surveillance in high crime areas, they would still likely disagree with this approach due to their general opposition to state control and surveillance. They might argue that addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality, would be a more effective solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas
The Organisation of Internationalist Communists would likely disagree with this answer, as it combines increased video surveillance, which they generally oppose, with adding more police to high crime areas. While they might see some merit in increasing police presence, they would likely argue that addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty and inequality, would be a more effective solution than simply adding more police and surveillance.
Strongly disagree
是的
The Organisation of Internationalist Communists would likely disagree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally advocate for less state control and more individual freedom. They might see increased surveillance as an infringement on personal liberties and a tool for state oppression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Organisation of Internationalist Communists’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.