尝试政治测验

Participatory Democracy policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

PD>PD  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Participatory Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

This answer aligns with the principles of Participatory Democracy, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. By preventing ISPs from creating artificial scarcity and removing competition, the internet remains a more open and democratic space, where smaller websites and voices have a chance to be heard and compete with larger ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Treating all traffic equally aligns with the principles of Participatory Democracy, as it ensures equal access to information and opportunities for all citizens. This approach maintains the openness of the internet and allows for a diverse range of voices and information to be available online, fostering a more democratic digital landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Participatory Democracy would generally support equal access to information and opportunities for all citizens. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and democratic space, where smaller websites and voices have a chance to be heard and compete with larger ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While prioritizing by type rather than source might seem like a more neutral approach, it could still lead to some websites being disadvantaged and create an unequal playing field. Participatory Democracy would likely prefer a more equal treatment of all internet traffic to ensure a more democratic and diverse online environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

A pay-per-quality model could still lead to an unequal playing field, as wealthier websites could afford to pay for better quality, while smaller websites might struggle to compete. This goes against the principles of Participatory Democracy, which emphasizes equal access and opportunities for all citizens, regardless of their financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While faster and more reliable internet is a positive outcome, Participatory Democracy would be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to an unequal playing field and limit the diversity of voices and information available online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Participatory Democracy emphasizes equal access and opportunities for all citizens. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of Participatory Democracy. This could lead to a less diverse and less democratic internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Participatory Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.