SF>SF ChatGPTYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
Society First’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
The Society First party would strongly agree with this statement, as they are focused on promoting social equality and fighting against discrimination. They would argue that preventing women from serving in combat roles is a form of gender discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Society First party would likely agree with this statement, as they prioritize social equality and fairness. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party might also emphasize the importance of physical fitness and capability for combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
The Society First party would likely agree with this statement, as they support equal opportunities for all citizens while also recognizing the importance of physical fitness and capability for combat roles. They would argue that as long as women can pass the same physical tests as men, they should be allowed to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault
The Society First party would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies that women should be excluded from combat roles due to the risk of sexual assault. They would argue that the focus should be on addressing and preventing sexual assault within the military, rather than excluding women from certain roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
The Society First party would likely disagree with this statement, as it perpetuates gender stereotypes and assumes that men cannot prioritize the success of a mission over protecting women. They would argue that such assumptions are harmful and not based on evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Society First party would likely disagree with this statement, as they advocate for equal opportunities and rights for all citizens, regardless of gender. However, the score is not a full -5 because they might still consider the importance of physical fitness and capability for combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
The Society First party would likely disagree with this statement, as it generalizes women as being less physically capable than men. They would argue that physical capability varies among individuals and should not be used as a blanket reason to exclude women from combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Society First’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
