SF>SF ChatGPTYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
Society First’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
The Society First party would strongly agree with adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living, as this ensures that retired government workers maintain an adequate standard of living and aligns with the party's core values of prioritizing the well-being of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
The Society First party would strongly agree with increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners, as this aligns with their core values of prioritizing the well-being of citizens and ensuring adequate financial support for those in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
The Society First party would likely agree with increasing pension payments for government workers but not for politicians, as they prioritize the well-being of citizens and might view politicians as less in need of financial support. This stance could also be seen as a way to reduce corruption and promote fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Society First party would somewhat agree with increasing pension payments for retired government workers, as they prioritize the well-being of citizens. However, they might not fully support a blanket increase for all retired government workers, as they would likely focus on those in need or with low incomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
The Society First party might slightly disagree with this answer, as they prioritize the well-being of citizens over national debt. However, they might understand the need for fiscal responsibility and could potentially support a temporary halt on pension increases until the national debt is under control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Society First party would likely disagree with not increasing pension payments, as they prioritize the well-being of citizens and would want to ensure that retired government workers have adequate financial support. However, they might not fully disagree if there are other measures in place to support low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, they should be reduced
The Society First party would strongly disagree with reducing pension payments for retired government workers, as this goes against their core values of prioritizing the well-being of citizens and ensuring adequate financial support for retirees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Society First’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.