Society First Party

Strongly agree

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

The Society First party would likely agree with replacing police with unarmed community-based responders for non-violent calls, as this approach aligns with their focus on community well-being and addressing social issues. This approach would allow for a more compassionate and effective response to non-violent situations, while still maintaining law enforcement for more serious incidents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Society First party would likely agree with redirecting some funding to social and community-based programs, as they prioritize the well-being of society as a whole. However, they may not fully support completely defunding the police, as they would still recognize the need for law enforcement in maintaining order and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

The Society First party might slightly agree with increasing funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities, as they would recognize the need for effective law enforcement in maintaining safety and order. However, their primary focus would likely be on addressing the root causes of crime through social and community-based programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Society First party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would see the value in investing in social and community-based programs to address the root causes of crime and improve overall societal well-being. However, they may not be entirely against police funding, recognizing the need for law enforcement in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

The Society First party would strongly disagree with abolishing the police, as they would understand the importance of maintaining law and order for a functioning society. While they may support redirecting some funding to social programs, they would not advocate for the complete removal of law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.