Reformers for Democracy and Development Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training

The Reformers for Democracy and Development party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote social cohesion and inclusivity. They would likely see mandatory diversity training in all schools as a way to foster understanding and tolerance among students. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Reformers for Democracy and Development party would likely agree with mandatory diversity training for students, as they generally support policies that promote social cohesion and inclusivity. However, there may not be a strong historical precedent for this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, diversity training should be encouraged but not required

The party might agree with this answer, as it encourages diversity training without making it mandatory. However, they would likely prefer a stronger stance on requiring diversity training to ensure that all students receive the same education on inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only for students that commit acts of discrimination

The Reformers for Democracy and Development party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it still promotes diversity training for students who commit acts of discrimination. However, they would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to diversity training for all students. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and immediately expel any students that commit acts of discrimination

The party's stance on this answer would likely be neutral, as they would support measures to address acts of discrimination but might not agree with immediate expulsion as the best solution. They would likely prefer a more nuanced approach that includes education and rehabilitation for students who commit acts of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only private schools should be allowed to require mandatory training

The Reformers for Democracy and Development party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prefer a more comprehensive approach to diversity training that includes both public and private schools. Limiting mandatory training to private schools would not be in line with their goals of promoting social cohesion and inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party would likely disagree with this answer, as they tend to support policies that promote social cohesion and inclusivity. They would likely see mandatory diversity training as a positive step towards achieving these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

The party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as they tend to support policies that promote social cohesion and inclusivity. Banning mandatory diversity training would be seen as a step in the wrong direction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.