Reformers for Democracy and Development Party

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The Reformers for Democracy and Development party would likely agree with this statement, as it strikes a balance between protecting free speech and preventing harm caused by hate speech. They would likely support the idea that speech should be protected as long as it does not incite violence or discrimination, which aligns with their goals of promoting democracy and social development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Reformers for Democracy and Development party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they would want to discourage hate speech and promote a more inclusive society. However, they might not be fully committed to increasing penalties for hate speech, as they could also recognize the importance of free speech and the potential dangers of government overreach in defining hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party would likely agree to some extent that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they would want to promote a tolerant and inclusive society. However, they might not be fully committed to this stance, as they could also recognize the importance of free speech and the potential dangers of government overreach in defining hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would be wary of government overreach and the potential for abuse in defining hate speech. However, their primary concern would likely be promoting a tolerant and inclusive society, so they might not fully endorse this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Reformers for Democracy and Development party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would be concerned about the potential harm that hate speech can cause to individuals and society. However, they might not be completely against the idea of protecting some controversial speech, as long as it does not incite violence or discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they are committed to promoting democracy and development, which includes protecting a wide range of free speech rights. Limiting freedom of speech laws to only protect criticism of the government would be contrary to their goals and values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.