RfDaD>RfDaD ChatGPTYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
Reformers for Democracy and Development’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
The Reformers for Democracy and Development party may strongly agree with replacing police with unarmed community-based responders for non-violent calls, as it aligns with their focus on social welfare and community development. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Reformers for Democracy and Development party may agree with redirecting some funding to social and community-based programs, as they generally support social welfare and development. However, there is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities
The party may somewhat agree with increasing funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities, but their primary focus is on social welfare and development. There is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The party may not strongly disagree with maintaining police funding, but they are likely to prioritize social and community-based programs. There is no specific historical example of their stance on this issue.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and abolish the police
The Reformers for Democracy and Development party is unlikely to support abolishing the police, as they have not shown any radical stance on law enforcement. They are more focused on social welfare and development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reformers for Democracy and Development’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
