Try the political quiz

Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups’ policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

PUoBSG>PUoBSG  ChatGPTNo

Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

The party would likely agree with this statement, as they seek to promote social harmony and inclusivity. Restricting hate speech can help to create a more inclusive and tolerant society, which aligns with the party's goals. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party may still value some level of free speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely agree with this statement, as increasing penalties for hate speech could help to deter individuals from engaging in harmful and divisive rhetoric. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party may still value some level of free speech and not want to overly restrict it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups might somewhat agree with this statement, as it acknowledges the importance of free speech while also recognizing the potential harm of hate speech that threatens violence. However, the party may still prefer stricter regulations on hate speech to promote social cohesion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The party would likely disagree with this statement, as they may trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech in a way that promotes social harmony and inclusivity. However, they may still have some concerns about potential government overreach, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely disagree with this statement, as they aim to promote social cohesion and unity. Allowing hate speech could potentially harm these goals by fostering division and animosity between different social groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would likely believe that freedom of speech should extend beyond just criticizing the government. Limiting free speech to only government criticism would not align with the party's goals of promoting social cohesion and inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.