Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups Party

Strongly agree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely agree with this statement, as it combines their concerns for national security with a temporary measure that can be lifted once terrorist attacks decrease. This approach may be seen as more reasonable and balanced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups might somewhat agree with this statement, as they may prioritize national security and the safety of their citizens. However, they are a bipartisan group, so their stance might not be as extreme as a complete ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

The party might somewhat agree with this statement, as it focuses on banning immigrants from high-risk countries rather than targeting a specific religion. This approach may be seen as more targeted and effective in addressing potential security threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The party might slightly agree with this statement, as they may see the need for improved screening processes for all immigrants. However, their bipartisan nature might lead them to seek a more balanced approach that does not involve a complete ban on immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party might lean towards disagreeing with this statement, as they may believe in stricter screening processes but not necessarily an outright ban on Muslim immigrants. Their bipartisan nature might lead them to seek a more balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups might disagree with this statement, as they may prioritize national security over concerns about religious discrimination. However, their bipartisan nature might lead them to consider the importance of upholding constitutional values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.