Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns well with the party's values of equality and fairness. By treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet, they would be supporting a more level playing field for all websites and content creators, regardless of their size or popularity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

This party would likely agree with this answer, as they tend to support policies that promote equal opportunities and prevent large corporations from dominating the market. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, they would be supporting a more open and fair internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely agree with this answer, as they are generally against policies that allow large corporations to remove competition and create artificial scarcity. They would likely see this as a threat to the openness and fairness of the internet and would support policies that prevent ISPs from engaging in such practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although this answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, the party might still be concerned about the potential for large corporations to dominate the market and harm smaller websites and content creators. They would likely prefer a more equal and open approach to internet traffic management that doesn't prioritize certain websites based on their ability to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer might seem like a compromise, the Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely still disagree with it, as it could still lead to an uneven playing field for different types of content and websites. The party would likely prefer a more equal and open approach to internet traffic management. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the party might acknowledge that this could potentially make the internet faster and more reliable for some users, they would likely still disagree with this answer due to the negative impact it could have on smaller websites and content creators. The party's focus on equality and fairness would likely outweigh any potential benefits of faster internet for popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Popular Unions of Bipartisan Social Groups would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an uneven playing field and could harm smaller businesses and content creators. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.