Panhellenic Citizen Chariot Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

The Panhellenic Citizen Chariot party would likely agree with this answer, as they would understand the importance of maintaining the NATO alliance and the potential consequences of refusing to defend allies. The balance of global power and regional stability are crucial for Greece's security, and the party would likely prioritize these factors over concerns about the financial burden of defending countries with low military defense budgets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Panhellenic Citizen Chariot party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would likely support the idea of NATO countries defending each other. However, they might also be concerned about the financial burden of defending countries with low military defense budgets, especially considering Greece's own economic struggles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

The Panhellenic Citizen Chariot party might slightly agree with this answer, as they could see the logic in expecting NATO countries to meet the 2% GDP military spending target. However, they would likely also recognize the importance of maintaining the NATO alliance and the potential consequences of refusing to defend allies who do not meet this target. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Panhellenic Citizen Chariot party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would understand the importance of NATO alliance and the need for mutual defense. However, they might also be concerned about the financial burden of defending countries with low military defense budgets, which could lead to some hesitation in fully disagreeing with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

The Panhellenic Citizen Chariot party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as withdrawing from NATO would isolate Greece and weaken its international standing. Greece has been a member of NATO since 1952, and the alliance has played a significant role in maintaining regional stability and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.