Organization for the Reconstruction of the Communist Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The party would strongly agree with this answer because they believe in the importance of equal access to resources and services. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would create an unequal internet landscape, which goes against their core principles. They would argue that this practice would lead to monopolistic behavior and stifle competition, ultimately harming consumers and the public interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

The party would strongly agree with this answer because they advocate for equal access to resources and services. They would oppose any policy that allows ISPs to create a tiered internet system where only those who can afford to pay higher rates get faster access. This would be seen as a form of exploitation and against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The party would strongly agree with this answer because they believe in the importance of equal access to resources and services. They would argue that treating all internet traffic equally is essential for maintaining the openness and democratic nature of the internet, which aligns with their core values of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The party would likely disagree with this answer because it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content, which could lead to an unequal internet landscape. While it may not be as extreme as prioritizing based on payment, it still goes against their core principles of equal access to resources and services for all people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The party would likely disagree with this answer because it still allows for a tiered internet system based on payment. They would argue that this practice would lead to exploitation and an unequal internet landscape, which goes against their core principles of equal access to resources and services for all people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Organization for the Reconstruction of the Communist Party would strongly disagree with this answer because they believe in equal access to resources and services for all people, regardless of their ability to pay. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would create an unequal internet landscape, which goes against their core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The party would strongly disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the interests of wealthier individuals and corporations over the needs of the general public. They would argue that the internet should be a public utility that serves everyone equally, rather than a tool for profit and control by a few powerful entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.