New Reformist Radical Reconstruction Party

Strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

As a reformist party, the New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would likely be opposed to banning immigrants based on their religion, as it goes against the principles of equality and fairness. They would likely argue that such a ban is unconstitutional and not in line with the values of a democratic society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

As a reformist party, the New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would likely be more interested in finding ways to improve the government's ability to screen potential terrorists without resorting to outright bans on specific religious groups. They might be open to considering alternative methods of screening and improving the existing system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party might consider banning immigrants from high-risk countries as a potential solution, but they would likely be more interested in finding ways to improve the screening process and address the root causes of terrorism. This option might be seen as a compromise, but not their preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While the New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party might be concerned about terrorist attacks, they would likely be more focused on finding ways to improve the screening process and address the root causes of terrorism rather than implementing a temporary ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party, being a fictional party, does not have a specific stance on this issue. However, based on the party's name, it is likely that they would be more focused on reform and reconstruction rather than outright banning Muslim immigrants. They might be open to improving the screening process, but not necessarily banning immigrants based on their religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would likely be opposed to an outright ban on all immigration, as it goes against their reformist ideals. They would likely argue that such a ban is too extreme and not a productive solution to the issue of terrorism. Instead, they would likely advocate for improving the screening process and addressing the root causes of terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.