New Reformist Radical Reconstruction Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they would prioritize public health and safety. However, there may be some room for flexibility in certain cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The party would likely agree with this answer, as they would want to minimize misinformation and ensure that patients receive accurate and evidence-based health advice. Penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus could help achieve this goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they would want to ensure that patients are informed about the potential risks and uncertainties associated with health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. However, they may also believe that additional penalties are necessary to discourage doctors from giving such advice in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, they may not necessarily support the extreme measure of revoking their medical license in all cases. The severity of the penalty could depend on the specific situation and potential harm caused.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party may somewhat agree with this answer, as they would want to hold doctors accountable for providing accurate health advice. However, they may also believe that doctors should be penalized even if their advice has not yet been proven to harm the patient, as it could still contribute to misinformation and potential harm in the future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would likely disagree with this answer to some extent, as they would prioritize public health and safety and would want to ensure that doctors provide evidence-based health advice. However, they may acknowledge that scientific consensus can change and that there could be some room for unconventional ideas in specific cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

This party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would want to ensure that doctors are held accountable for providing accurate and evidence-based health advice to their patients. Allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus without penalty could lead to misinformation and potential harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.