New Reformist Radical Reconstruction Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would strongly agree with this answer, as they would be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. They would argue that this could lead to ISPs removing competition, creating artificial scarcity, and increasing prices, which would be detrimental to consumers and businesses alike. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The party would strongly agree with this answer, as they would support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and businesses. They would argue that treating all traffic equally is essential for maintaining the openness of the internet and fostering innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party would likely agree with this answer, as they would support net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and businesses. They would be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as stifling innovation and creating an unfair advantage for larger companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The party might be somewhat open to the idea of a pay-per-quality model, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. They would likely argue that such a model could still lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prioritize net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and businesses. While they might acknowledge that prioritizing certain types of content could potentially improve user experience, they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative effects of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the party might acknowledge that this could potentially make the internet faster and more reliable for some users, they would likely still disagree with this answer due to their commitment to net neutrality and equal access to the internet for all users and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The New Reformist Radical Reconstruction party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prioritize equal access to the internet for all users and businesses. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.