Fighting Socialist Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Fighting Socialist Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they would prioritize public health and safety. They would argue that penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help decrease misinformation and protect patients from potentially harmful advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they would prioritize public health and safety. However, there may not be a strong historical example to support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Fighting Socialist Party might agree with this answer, as they would want to ensure that doctors who give harmful advice are not allowed to continue practicing. However, they might also consider the severity of the advice and the potential for rehabilitation before completely revoking a medical license. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Fighting Socialist Party might agree with this answer, as it promotes transparency and allows patients to make informed decisions. However, they might also argue that simply disclosing that the advice contradicts scientific consensus is not enough to protect patients from potentially harmful advice and that doctors should be penalized for giving such advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Fighting Socialist Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would want to ensure that doctors are held accountable for harmful advice. However, they might also argue that waiting for harm to occur is not proactive enough and that doctors should be penalized for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, regardless of whether harm has been proven. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prioritize public health and safety over the freedom to try unconventional ideas. They would likely argue that scientific consensus should be followed until new evidence is presented and accepted by the medical community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prioritize public health and safety over individual doctor's freedom to give potentially harmful advice. There may not be a strong historical example to support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.