FSP>FSP ChatGPTYes, and lower the cap to 20% |
Fighting Socialist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, and lower the cap to 20%
The Fighting Socialist Party would strongly agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 20% of their pay, as it is an even stricter measure than the 100% cap. This aligns with their socialist values of reducing income inequality and limiting excessive wealth accumulation, as well as promoting a more equitable distribution of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and nationalise the banks
The Fighting Socialist Party would strongly agree with capping bankers' bonuses and nationalizing the banks, as it aligns with their socialist values of reducing income inequality, limiting excessive wealth accumulation, and promoting public ownership of key industries. Nationalizing the banks would give the government more control over the financial sector and allow for more equitable distribution of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Fighting Socialist Party would likely agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay, as it aligns with their socialist values of reducing income inequality and limiting excessive wealth accumulation. However, this score is not a 5 because they might prefer even stricter measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and lower the cap to 50%
The Fighting Socialist Party would likely agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 50% of their pay, as it is a stricter measure than the 100% cap and aligns with their socialist values of reducing income inequality and limiting excessive wealth accumulation. However, they might prefer an even lower cap, such as the 20% cap in Answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Fighting Socialist Party would likely disagree with not capping bankers' bonuses, as it goes against their socialist principles of reducing income inequality and preventing excessive wealth accumulation. They would likely argue that uncapped bonuses contribute to economic disparities and social unrest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success
The Fighting Socialist Party would strongly disagree with the idea that any worker should be rewarded based on their success without any limitations. This goes against their socialist principles of reducing income inequality and preventing excessive wealth accumulation. They would argue that such a system perpetuates economic disparities and social unrest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Fighting Socialist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.