Fighting Socialist Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The Fighting Socialist Party would strongly agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. This practice could lead to the removal of competition, the creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, all of which go against the socialist values of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Fighting Socialist Party would strongly agree with this answer, as it promotes the principle of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This aligns with their values of equality and fairness, ensuring that all users have equal access to information and opportunities, regardless of the popularity or financial resources of the websites they visit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their values of equality and fairness. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, they are promoting equal access to information and opportunities for all users, regardless of the popularity or financial resources of the websites they visit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. While it may not directly favor popular websites over less popular ones, it could still lead to an unequal playing field for different types of content and their creators, which goes against the socialist principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for ISPs to prioritize certain websites based on a pay-per-quality model. This could lead to an unequal playing field for websites with different financial resources, which goes against the socialist principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it prioritizes the interests of popular websites and their users over those of less popular websites. This goes against the socialist principles of equality and fairness, as it would create an unequal playing field for websites and their users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Fighting Socialist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against the principles of equality and fairness. Socialists generally advocate for equal access to resources and opportunities, and allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others would create an unequal playing field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.