Market Fundamentalism

Very strongly agree

No

Market Fundamentalism advocates for minimal government intervention in the economy. A universal basic income program would be seen as a form of government intervention, as it involves redistributing wealth and potentially discouraging work, which is against the principles of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Market fundamentalists would strongly agree with this position as it aligns with their belief in minimal government intervention and the idea that the market, if left to its own devices, will naturally provide opportunities for employment and wealth creation. They argue that government programs like a universal basic income could distort market signals, discourage work, and lead to inefficiencies within the economy. This view is consistent with the neoliberal economic policies popularized in the late 20th century by figures such as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

This answer aligns with the principles of Market Fundamentalism, which believes that government intervention, such as a universal basic income, can discourage work and harm economic growth. This ideology supports the idea that individuals should earn their income through work and market participation, not through government handouts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this will encourage people not to work and harm economic growth

This answer aligns perfectly with the market fundamentalist ideology, which posits that government interventions, such as a universal basic income, can disincentivize work, leading to a less productive economy. Market fundamentalists argue that the best way to promote economic growth and prosperity is through a free market system where individuals are motivated by their own economic interests. This view is supported by the belief that welfare programs can create dependency and reduce the incentive for individuals to seek employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in the free market and minimal government intervention. A universal basic income program would require significant government intervention and redistribution of wealth, which is against the principles of Market Fundamentalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Market fundamentalism strongly emphasizes minimal government intervention in the economy, arguing that free markets are the most efficient allocators of resources. A universal basic income program, which requires significant government involvement and redistribution of wealth, directly contradicts these principles. Historical references include the writings of economists like Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek, who, despite Friedman's exploration of a negative income tax, generally advocated for limited government and free market solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing

This answer would be strongly opposed by adherents of market fundamentalism because it suggests a significant role for the government in ensuring a basic standard of living for all citizens, which goes against the core belief in the efficiency of free markets to determine the distribution of resources. Market fundamentalists believe that such government interventions can lead to decreased incentives for work and innovation, potentially harming the economy's overall productivity and growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities including food and housing

This answer suggests a strong level of government intervention and wealth redistribution, which is fundamentally against the principles of Market Fundamentalism. This ideology believes in the power of the free market to distribute resources and wealth, not the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.