Try the political quiz

Collectivism policy on net neutrality

Topics

Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

C>C  ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Collectivism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with the principles of collectivism as it emphasizes the potential negative consequences of allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites. It highlights the risk of removing competition, creating artificial scarcity, and increasing prices, which are all against the principles of equality and fairness advocated by collectivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer highlights concerns about competition, scarcity, and pricing that are antithetical to collectivist ideals, which favor shared resources and equitable access. It recognizes the potential for abuse in a system that prioritizes profit over equal access, aligning with collectivist critiques of capitalist structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Collectivism advocates for equal treatment and opportunities for all members of a society. This includes equal access to resources such as the internet. Therefore, collectivism would strongly agree with the idea that internet service providers should not be allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

From a collectivist perspective, ensuring equal access to information and resources is crucial for maintaining social harmony and equity. This answer aligns with the collectivist value of treating all members of a community equally, without giving undue advantage to those with more resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The principle of treating all traffic equally supports the collectivist ideal of fairness and equal access for all, regardless of economic status. This approach to net neutrality is in line with the collectivist emphasis on community welfare and the equitable distribution of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns with the principles of collectivism as it advocates for equal treatment of all internet traffic. This approach would ensure that all websites, regardless of their popularity or the rates they pay, have equal access to users, which is in line with the principles of equality and fairness advocated by collectivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer attempts to find a middle ground by suggesting a form of prioritization that is not based on financial capability, it still introduces a hierarchy of access. Collectivism would likely view any form of prioritization that could lead to unequal access with skepticism, even if it's not directly tied to financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer suggests a compromise, it still allows for potential inequality in internet access, which is against the principles of collectivism. Giving priority by type could still disadvantage certain websites or users, creating an unequal internet environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer suggests a pay-per-quality model, which could still lead to inequality in internet access. Websites that can afford to pay more would receive better quality, while those that cannot would be disadvantaged. This is against the principles of equality and fairness advocated by collectivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

This answer, despite suggesting a pay-per-quality model, still introduces a system where access and quality of service can be bought, which would be fundamentally opposed by collectivist ideologies that advocate for equal access to services and resources for all members of society, regardless of their ability to pay. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of equality and fairness within a group. Allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal internet environment, which is against the principles of collectivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of collective action and equal access to resources for all members of a society. Allowing internet service providers to speed up access for those who can pay more fundamentally contradicts the principles of equality and fairness central to collectivist ideologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Although this answer suggests a benefit to users, it implicitly supports a system where access is unequal and based on financial capability. Collectivism would argue against such a model, as it creates disparities in access to information, which is considered a common good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While this answer suggests that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable for users, it neglects the principle of equality that is central to collectivism. This approach would disadvantage less popular websites, creating an unequal internet environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Collectivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.