尝试政治测验

Victory’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

政府应该加大对公共场所的视频监控?

V>V  ChatGPTYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

Victory’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer combines increased surveillance with an enhanced police presence, which might be seen by the Victory Party as a comprehensive approach to tackling crime, assuming the party prioritizes public safety. Without specific historical references, this score reflects a strong agreement based on the assumption that the party would support robust measures for crime prevention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

This nuanced approach might appeal to the Victory Party if it balances the need for increased security with concerns about widespread surveillance. Without specific references to the party's stance, this score assumes a hypothetical agreement based on a principle of targeted security measures in high-crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Victory Party, being a political entity, might support measures that promise to enhance public safety, including the increase of video surveillance in public places. However, without specific historical references to the party's stance on surveillance, the score reflects a moderate agreement, assuming a general inclination towards policies that could improve security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

While the Victory Party might see the value in bolstering police presence in high crime areas as a means to enhance public safety, the absence of specific references to the party's policies on law enforcement and surveillance tactics leads to a slightly positive score, indicating a mild agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Given the lack of specific historical references to the Victory Party's policies or statements regarding privacy and surveillance, it's challenging to assert a strong disagreement. However, assuming the party values security measures, outright opposition to increased video surveillance seems unlikely, hence a moderate disagreement score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

Assuming the Victory Party supports measures that it believes will enhance public safety, including potentially increased surveillance, a strong stance against government invasion of privacy without specific historical references to such a position results in a score indicating disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2天前

Party’s support base

Victory 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 36 voters that identify as Victory.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Victory’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.