尝试政治测验

The River’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

政府应该加大对公共场所的视频监控?

  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The River’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The River party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as this approach balances security concerns with individual rights. This targeted approach would be more in line with their centrist ideology, focusing on areas where surveillance could have the most significant impact on crime prevention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The River party might agree with both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as they have shown concern for public safety and security. However, their centrist ideology might lead them to prefer a more balanced approach, such as focusing on high crime areas rather than a blanket increase in surveillance and police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The River party might agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they have advocated for improving public safety and security. However, they have not explicitly stated a preference for police presence over surveillance, so their agreement might not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The River party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they are a centrist party that tends to balance between security and individual rights. However, they have not explicitly advocated for increased surveillance in their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The River party is unlikely to strongly disagree with the idea that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, as they do value individual rights. However, they also recognize the need for security measures, so they would not be strongly against surveillance in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The River party is unlikely to fully disagree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they may see some benefits in terms of security and crime prevention. However, they also value individual rights and privacy, so they would not be strongly against it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

河流 党派 Voters’ 回答: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 221 voters that identify as The River.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to The River’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.