尝试政治测验

The River’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The River’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The River party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their principles of fairness and equal opportunities. Treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet would promote a level playing field for all websites, regardless of their size or popularity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The River party would likely agree with this answer because they believe in equal opportunities and fairness. Allowing ISPs to slow down access to less popular websites would create an unfair advantage for larger, more established websites, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

The River party would likely agree with this answer because they are concerned about the potential for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. This would go against their principles of fairness and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

The River party might be somewhat open to the idea of prioritizing internet traffic by type, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to abuse this system and create an unfair advantage for certain websites. Their preference would be to treat all traffic equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

While a pay-per-quality model might seem more fair on the surface, The River party would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to manipulate this system to favor certain websites and stifle competition. Their preference would be to treat all traffic equally and maintain the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While The River party might acknowledge that speeding up access to popular websites could potentially make the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would likely still disagree with this approach due to the negative impact on less popular websites and the potential for stifling competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The River party is a centrist political party in Greece that generally supports policies that promote fairness and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an uneven playing field, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to The River’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.