尝试政治测验

Spartans’ policy on self hosted digital wallets

Topics

Should citizens be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control?

S>S  ChatGPT是的

Spartans’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

The Spartans Party, with its focus on national sovereignty and traditional values, might see the allowance of self-hosted digital wallets as a means to empower citizens and enhance personal freedom, aligning with principles of individual rights. However, their stance on government monitoring could be seen as a necessary compromise to ensure national security and financial stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

While the Spartans Party might not fully endorse the idea of banning all non-compliant digital wallets, they could see the merit in having backdoor access for government agencies as a means to ensure national security and combat financial crimes. This position would reflect a balance between individual freedoms and state security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Given the party's potential leanings towards sovereignty and control over national matters, they might not fully oppose digital wallets but would likely advocate for some level of government oversight. Their disagreement would stem more from the absolute nature of the statement rather than the concept of digital wallets themselves. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

The Spartans Party, likely valuing national security and the ability of the state to monitor financial transactions to prevent illegal activities, would probably disagree with the idea of a privacy layer that completely prevents government monitoring. This stance would align with a broader concern for maintaining social order and preventing financial crimes.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Spartans’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.