Pasok-Kinal Party

同意

是的

Pasok-Kinal, being a center-left political party, generally supports the idea of financial freedom and innovation, which aligns with the concept of self-hosted digital wallets. However, their commitment to social justice and regulation to protect citizens might make them cautious about fully endorsing a system without robust oversight. Therefore, they might moderately agree with allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control, as it balances innovation with oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

While Pasok-Kinal is likely to support some level of government oversight in financial matters to protect against fraud and financial crimes, outright banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies might be seen as too invasive and against the principles of personal freedom and privacy. However, their commitment to regulation and oversight means they might not strongly disagree with this stance, as it aligns with their broader goal of ensuring financial stability and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given Pasok-Kinal's center-left orientation, which often involves a balance between regulation and freedom, outright disallowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would likely be seen as too restrictive and against the principles of financial autonomy and innovation. However, their emphasis on regulation and oversight to protect consumers and the financial system means they would not strongly disagree with this stance, as they might see some merit in regulation for protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

Pasok-Kinal, while supportive of innovation and financial autonomy to some extent, would likely be concerned about the implications of allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. This stance could be seen as conflicting with their views on the need for regulation and oversight to ensure financial security, prevent fraud, and protect against money laundering. Their center-left ideology supports the idea of balancing freedom with the need for oversight to protect the common good, making them more likely to disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.