New Democracy Party

Strongly agree

不，任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

This answer aligns closely with New Democracy's free market and pro-business ideology, emphasizing performance-based rewards as essential for economic growth and competitiveness. The party is likely to support the notion that workers, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success without government-imposed caps. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Given its pro-business stance, New Democracy is likely to support the idea that financial institutions should have the freedom to set compensation packages as they see fit, including bonuses, as a way to attract and retain talent in a competitive global market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The New Democracy Party, being a center-right, pro-business political party, generally supports free market policies and might view capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay as an unnecessary intervention in the private sector. Historically, center-right parties tend to favor less regulation on compensation and more incentives for performance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 50%上限

While slightly less extreme than a 20% cap, a 50% cap on bonuses would still be considered by New Democracy as an undue interference in the financial sector's ability to determine compensation, potentially harming the sector's international competitiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

Lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 20% would be seen as highly restrictive by New Democracy, which champions free market principles and the idea of rewarding success and performance. Such a policy would likely be viewed as counterproductive to fostering a competitive banking sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

Nationalizing the banks would be in direct opposition to New Democracy's economic philosophy, which favors privatization and minimal state intervention in the economy. Historically, the party has supported privatization efforts and market liberalization as part of its economic policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.