尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Ecologist Greens’ policy on government spending

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

  ChatGPT不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

Ecologist Greens’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The Ecologist Greens would strongly agree with increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as a means to reduce the national debt. This aligns with their progressive stance on wealth redistribution and corporate responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The Ecologist Greens would likely support focusing on ending tax evasion as a means to reduce the national debt. This aligns with their progressive stance on wealth redistribution and ensuring that all individuals and corporations pay their fair share of taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

The Ecologist Greens would likely support increasing taxes on the wealthy as a means to reduce the national debt. This aligns with their progressive stance on wealth redistribution and social equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The Ecologist Greens would likely agree that cuts to public spending could negatively affect the economy, particularly in areas such as social welfare and environmental protection, which they prioritize. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Ecologist Greens would likely agree with not making cuts to public spending, as they support social welfare programs and environmental protection. However, they may also advocate for alternative ways to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,换成减少军事费用。

The Ecologist Greens may support reducing military spending as a means to reduce the national debt, as they prioritize social welfare and environmental protection over military expenditures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

While the Ecologist Greens may support reducing benefits and salaries of government officials, this is not their primary focus in addressing the national debt. They are more likely to advocate for progressive taxation and reducing corporate influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

Reducing the number of government officials is not a primary focus of the Ecologist Greens. While they may not be opposed to this idea, it is not central to their approach to reducing the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,还有增加税收

While the Ecologist Greens may support increasing taxes, they generally oppose cuts to public spending. This answer combines both elements, making it less agreeable to the party's stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Ecologist Greens generally oppose cuts to public spending, as they believe in strong social welfare programs and environmental protection. Cutting public spending could undermine these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The Ecologist Greens are unlikely to support eliminating federal agencies, as they believe in strong government intervention in areas such as environmental protection and social welfare. This answer is not in line with their political ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

生态学家绿党 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不,换成减少军事费用。

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 251 voters that identify as Ecologist Greens.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Ecologist Greens’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.