尝试政治测验

Course of Freedom’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Course of Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

This answer aligns strongly with the party's liberal values and support for individual rights and freedoms. They would likely strongly agree with treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet, as it promotes a more equal and open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The party would likely agree with not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it promotes a more equal and open internet. This aligns with their liberal values and support for individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Course of Freedom would likely agree with this answer, as they would be concerned about the potential for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. This would go against their liberal values and support for individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While prioritizing by type rather than source might be a more acceptable compromise, Course of Freedom would likely still prefer a completely equal and open internet. They might not strongly disagree with this answer, but it would not be their preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

A pay-per-quality model could still lead to an unequal internet and limit the freedom of information, which goes against the party's liberal values and support for individual rights and freedoms. They would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not promote a completely equal and open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While faster and more reliable internet is a positive outcome, Course of Freedom would likely prioritize the importance of an equal and open internet over potential speed improvements. They would likely disagree with this answer due to concerns about limiting freedom of information and creating an unequal internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Course of Freedom is a liberal political party that values individual rights and freedoms. They would likely disagree with allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as it could lead to an unequal internet and limit the freedom of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Course of Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.