尝试政治测验

Antarsya’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

政府应该加大对公共场所的视频监控?

A>A  ChatGPT

Antarsya’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Given Antarsya's stance on protecting civil liberties and opposing what they perceive as state overreach, they would strongly agree with not increasing video surveillance in public places. They would likely argue that such measures are a step towards a surveillance state and infringe on individual privacy and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

This statement aligns closely with Antarsya's views on government surveillance and privacy. They would strongly agree that the government has already gone too far in invading the privacy of citizens, reflecting their broader critique of state power and control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

While Antarsya would oppose increased surveillance, their stance on adding more police to high crime areas is less clear. They generally advocate for addressing the root causes of crime such as poverty and inequality, rather than increasing police presence, which they might view as a band-aid solution that does not address underlying issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Although specifying high crime areas might seem like a compromise, Antarsya would likely still view this as an unacceptable expansion of state surveillance powers. They would be concerned about the potential for abuse and the impact on communities targeted by such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Antarsya, being a far-left coalition that emphasizes anti-capitalism, anti-imperialism, and direct democracy, would strongly oppose measures that could be seen as increasing state surveillance and control over individuals. They would likely view an increase in video surveillance in public places as an infringement on personal freedoms and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer combines two measures that Antarsya would likely oppose: increased surveillance and an increased police presence. They would view both as indicative of a move towards a more authoritarian state and contrary to their vision of a society based on direct democracy and respect for individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Antarsya’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.