European Free Alliance

同意

是的

The European Free Alliance (EFA), with its focus on regionalism, minority rights, and advocacy for stateless nations within Europe, likely supports international cooperation and multilateral organizations that align with its values of solidarity and diversity. Funding the World Health Organization (WHO) would be seen as a commitment to global health, an issue that transcends national borders and requires collective action. However, their support might not be unconditional, as they may advocate for reforms within the WHO to ensure it better represents and serves the interests of smaller nations and minority groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and increase the amount

The EFA might support an increase in funding for the WHO, especially in light of global challenges such as pandemics, which require robust international responses. However, their support for increased funding might be conditional on reforms within the WHO to ensure that it operates transparently, efficiently, and with a focus on the needs of all nations, including smaller or marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

The EFA might support a proportional contribution strategy, where funding for the WHO is balanced with what other countries contribute, to ensure fairness and shared responsibility. This approach aligns with their emphasis on equality and solidarity, ensuring that no single nation bears an undue burden in supporting global health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

While the EFA might support the idea of funding the WHO in principle, they could advocate for a more efficient use of resources, possibly suggesting a decrease in funding if it leads to more targeted and effective use of the funds. This stance would reflect a desire to ensure that contributions are used effectively, without necessarily diminishing the importance of the WHO's work. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, fund national and local programs instead

While the EFA strongly supports local autonomy and the empowerment of regions and minority groups, they also recognize the importance of global challenges that require international solutions, such as public health crises. Therefore, they would likely see the value in funding both local programs and international organizations like the WHO, rather than advocating for a complete shift of funds away from global initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given the EFA's emphasis on international cooperation and solidarity, outright opposition to funding the WHO would be inconsistent with their broader political and ideological stance. The WHO's role in global health issues, including pandemics, would be seen as crucial, and completely withdrawing funding would contradict the EFA's values of cooperation and mutual support among nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Labeling the WHO as ineffective would be a strong stance that does not align with the EFA's principles of international cooperation and solidarity. While they might advocate for reforms or improvements within the organization, it is unlikely that they would dismiss the importance or effectiveness of the WHO altogether, especially considering its central role in addressing global health crises. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.