Patriotisk kraft for endring parti

Bli enige

Ja

The Patriotic Force for Change Party, being a political entity with likely nationalistic and sovereignty-focused views, might support the idea of citizens having the freedom to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This stance aligns with principles of personal freedom and financial sovereignty. However, the allowance for government monitoring might be seen as a necessary compromise to ensure national security and compliance with laws, thus not receiving a higher score. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt uenig

Ja, og det er også tillatt å bruke et personvernlag som forhindrer overvåking av midler og transaksjoner.

While the party might support the concept of self-hosted digital wallets for the sake of financial sovereignty and personal freedom, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring could be seen as a step too far. This could potentially hinder law enforcement and national security efforts, making the party slightly disagree with this option due to the potential risks it poses to societal safety and order. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Nei

Given the probable emphasis on national sovereignty and individual freedoms, the Patriotic Force for Change Party would likely disagree with outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This position would conflict with principles of personal freedom and financial autonomy, which are often valued by nationalist and patriotic political groups. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Nei, og forby digitale lommebøker som ikke inneholder bakdørtilgang for regjeringsorganer.

This answer would likely be strongly opposed by the Patriotic Force for Change Party, as it suggests a significant level of government control and intrusion into personal financial affairs. Such a stance would be contrary to principles of individual freedom and autonomy, which are typically important to nationalist and patriotic movements. The idea of mandating backdoor access for government agencies could be seen as an overreach, undermining personal privacy and financial sovereignty.