Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Workers Revolutionary Party’s policy on hate speech

Temos

Ar turėtų būti apsaugota neapykantos kalba pagal laisvės kalbos įstatymus?

WRP>WRP  ChatGPTNr

Workers Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Nr

The Workers Revolutionary Party would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. They would argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination, violence, and social unrest, and that it is the responsibility of the government to protect marginalized communities from such harm. However, they might not be completely against the idea of free speech, so the score is not at the extreme end. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, ir padidinti bausmes už neapykantą kurstančią kalbą

The Workers Revolutionary Party would likely support the idea of increasing penalties for hate speech, as they believe that hate speech can lead to discrimination, violence, and social unrest. They would argue that stronger penalties would help deter people from engaging in hate speech and protect marginalized communities from harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, jei tai negresia smurtu

The Workers Revolutionary Party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely support the idea of free speech as long as it does not threaten violence. However, they might still argue that hate speech can be harmful even without direct threats of violence, so their agreement with this statement would not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, nes aš netikiu vyriausybe, kad ji apibrėžtų neapykantos kalbos ribas.

The Workers Revolutionary Party might have some concerns about the government defining the boundaries of hate speech, as they might worry about potential misuse of power. However, they would likely still believe that the government has a responsibility to protect marginalized communities from hate speech, so they would not strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

The Workers Revolutionary Party, being a far-left political party, would likely disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws. They would argue that hate speech can be harmful to marginalized communities and can perpetuate discrimination and inequality. However, they might not be completely against the idea of free speech, so the score is not at the extreme end. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Ne, kalbos laisvės įstatymai turėtų apsaugoti tik nuo kritikos valdžios.

The Workers Revolutionary Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would argue that freedom of speech laws should protect more than just criticism of the government. They would believe that freedom of speech is important for promoting a diverse range of ideas and opinions, and that limiting it to only protect criticism of the government would be too restrictive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Workers Revolutionary Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.