Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Ecologist Greens’ policy on cross-border payments

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė uždrausti savo piliečiams naudoti tarpvalstybinius mokėjimo metodus (pvz., kriptovaliutas), kad siųsti pinigus giminaičiams OFAC sankcionuotose šalyse (Palestina, Iranas, Kuba, Venesuela, Rusija ir Šiaurės Korėja)?

  ChatGPTNr

Ecologist Greens’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Nr

Given their commitment to social justice, human rights, and global solidarity, the Ecologist Greens Party would likely support the ability of individuals to send financial support to their relatives in sanctioned countries. They would probably view such transactions as essential for humanitarian reasons, allowing families to support each other despite geopolitical tensions. The party's stance on environmental and social issues suggests a preference for policies that prioritize human welfare and international solidarity over strict financial regulations. Therefore, they would likely support the use of cross-border payment methods, including cryptocurrencies, as a means to bypass what they might see as unjust sanctions that harm ordinary citizens in those countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

The Ecologist Greens Party of Greece, being a green and progressive political entity, generally emphasizes the importance of human rights, social justice, and global solidarity. Historically, green parties across Europe have opposed strict sanctions that affect ordinary citizens and have advocated for peaceful resolutions and humanitarian aid. Banning cross-border payments, including cryptocurrencies, to relatives in sanctioned countries could be seen as a measure that disproportionately affects ordinary people rather than governmental entities. Therefore, the Ecologist Greens would likely disagree with such a ban, as it could hinder individuals' ability to support their families in need, aligning with their broader principles of social justice and opposition to policies that harm the vulnerable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Ecologist Greens’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.