Victory Party

Very strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This approach aligns with promoting transparency and informed decision-making in healthcare, which could be seen as a balanced stance that the Victory Party might strongly support, as it respects both the diversity of medical opinions and the patient's right to be fully informed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This position might resonate with the Victory Party if they prioritize patient safety and evidence-based practice, agreeing that penalties should only be applied when advice has resulted in proven harm, thus supporting accountability while respecting professional autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

If the Victory Party values innovation and the exploration of alternative viewpoints, they might agree with the idea that scientific consensus is not static and that there should be room for unconventional ideas in medicine, as long as they do not pose a direct risk to patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Without explicit details on the Victory Party's policies towards healthcare and scientific debate, one might infer that they could lean towards supporting the freedom of medical professionals to express divergent views, provided they are not harmful, thus slightly agreeing with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

While reducing misinformation is a universal goal, the Victory Party might view the penalization of doctors for dissenting views as too restrictive, preferring methods that encourage accurate information dissemination without stifling professional discourse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Given the lack of specific information about the Victory Party's stance on medical issues and scientific consensus, it's challenging to accurately predict their position. However, assuming the Victory Party values freedom of speech and diverse opinions, they might moderately disagree with penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus, favoring a more open discourse in the medical community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

Assuming the Victory Party supports a degree of freedom in professional opinions within the medical field, they would likely strongly disagree with such severe consequences for doctors without clear evidence of harm or malpractice, emphasizing the importance of debate and diversity of thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.