The River Party

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The River party would likely agree with this answer, as it strikes a balance between protecting freedom of speech and preventing harm caused by hate speech. By allowing hate speech as long as it does not threaten violence, they can maintain their commitment to individual liberties while also protecting vulnerable groups from potential harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The River party would likely somewhat agree with this answer, as they are a centrist and liberal party that values social inclusivity and the protection of minority groups. They might support increasing penalties for hate speech as a way to deter harmful behavior and promote social cohesion. However, they might also be cautious about limiting freedom of speech too much, as they value individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The River party would likely somewhat agree with the idea that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. As a centrist and liberal party, they would be concerned about the potential harm caused by hate speech to minority groups and social cohesion. However, they might also be cautious about limiting freedom of speech too much, as they value individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The River party might slightly agree with this answer, as they are a liberal party that values individual liberties and might be wary of government overreach. However, their commitment to social liberalism and inclusivity would likely lead them to prioritize the protection of minority groups from hate speech over concerns about government defining the boundaries of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The River party, being a centrist and liberal party, would likely disagree with the idea of completely protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws. They would likely argue that hate speech can lead to discrimination and harm to minority groups, which goes against their values of social liberalism and inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The River party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are a liberal party that values individual liberties and freedom of speech. They would not support limiting freedom of speech laws to only protect criticism of the government, as this would go against their commitment to democratic values and individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.