TR>TR ChatGPTNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
The River’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
This option is most in line with The River party's commitment to the rule of law and human rights. Giving suspected terrorists a fair trial ensures that their rights are respected and that justice is served in a transparent and accountable manner. This approach also helps to maintain Greece's international reputation and adherence to international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
The River party would likely strongly agree with this option, as it aligns with their commitment to the rule of law and human rights. Capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists allows for due process and the possibility of gathering valuable intelligence. This approach also avoids the potential negative consequences of assassinations, such as retaliation or increased radicalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Similar to answer 3, The River party might consider this option if there is undeniable evidence of a planned attack against Greece. This approach balances national security concerns with the party's commitment to the rule of law and human rights. However, the party would still likely prefer non-violent methods if possible. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
The River party might be more open to this option, as it includes the condition of undeniable evidence of the suspect's involvement in an attack against Greece. This approach would still prioritize the rule of law and national security, but it is not a strong agreement because the party would likely prefer non-violent methods if possible. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The River party would likely lean towards not assassinating suspected terrorists in foreign countries, as it would prefer to adhere to international law and human rights norms. However, this score is not a strong agreement because the party might consider other options depending on the circumstances and evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The River party is a centrist, liberal party that generally supports the rule of law and human rights. Assassinating suspected terrorists without any conditions would likely be seen as a violation of these principles. There are no specific historical examples of The River party advocating for such actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
The River Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 697 voters that identify as The River.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The River’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.