The River, known in Greek as To Potami, is a centrist and social-liberal political party in Greece. Established in February 2014 by Stavros Theodorakis, a well-known journalist and television presenter, the party sought to represent a moderate, reformist,… Read more
ChatGPTYes |
The River’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes
The River Party, being a centrist to centre-left political entity in Greece, would likely support some form of restriction on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, aligning with a more ethical foreign policy stance. However, the party's moderate positioning suggests they might not fully endorse the most stringent restrictions without considering the broader geopolitical and economic implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations
While The River Party may support restrictions on arms sales to countries with poor human rights records, the call for a total ban might be seen as too extreme for their centrist to centre-left stance. They would likely appreciate the emphasis on human rights but might be concerned about the feasibility and potential diplomatic repercussions of such a blanket policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries
The River Party's position on banning all military aid to any foreign countries is less clear, as their centrist to centre-left ideology does not necessarily align with a blanket ban on military aid. Such a policy could conflict with Greece's strategic interests and obligations, particularly within the context of its membership in international alliances like NATO. The party would likely weigh the benefits of military aid against ethical considerations on a case-by-case basis. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies
The River Party, with its emphasis on ethical governance and human rights, would likely disagree with a blanket policy of no restrictions on arms sales, especially if it means supplying countries accused of human rights violations. This stance could undermine global human rights efforts and conflict with the party's likely commitment to upholding international norms and ethics in foreign policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given The River Party's centrist to centre-left orientation and its likely emphasis on human rights and ethical governance, it would probably disagree with the notion of having no restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This stance would be inconsistent with a centrist or progressive approach to foreign policy that balances national interests with global human rights standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The River’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.