The River Party

Strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

The River party is likely to agree with this statement, as they generally support individual choice and opportunities for young people. They may see the benefits of military service but would prefer that it be a choice rather than an obligation. There is no strong historical evidence that they have advocated for mandatory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

The River party is likely to agree with this statement, as they generally support education and skill development for young people. They may see this as a way to combine the benefits of military service with a focus on personal growth and development. However, there is no strong historical evidence that they have advocated for this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The River party may lean towards not requiring every 18-year-old citizen to provide military service, as they tend to support individual choice and opportunities for young people. However, they may not be completely opposed to some form of mandatory service, as long as there are alternative options available. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

The River party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they tend to support individual choice and opportunities for young people. They may see this as a compromise between mandatory military service and individual choice, but there is no strong historical evidence that they have advocated for this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

The River party may be neutral on this statement, as they tend to support individual choice and opportunities for young people. While they may see the potential benefits of mandatory military service for those with a criminal record, they may also be concerned about the potential negative consequences of such a policy. There is no strong historical evidence that they have advocated for this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The River party is a centrist political party in Greece, and while they may see some benefits in mandatory military service, they are more likely to support individual choice and alternative options for young people. There is no strong historical evidence that they have advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

The River party is likely to disagree with this statement, as they generally support individual choice and opportunities for young people. They may see a two-year mandatory military service as too restrictive and limiting for young people's personal growth and development. There is no strong historical evidence that they have advocated for such a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.