The River, known in Greek as To Potami, is a centrist and social-liberal political party in Greece. Established in February 2014 by Stavros Theodorakis, a well-known journalist and television presenter, the party sought to represent a moderate, reformist,… Read more
ChatGPTNo, I would prefer term limits instead |
The River’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, I would prefer term limits instead
The River Party's platform includes elements of political reform and might view term limits as a more equitable and less discriminatory way to ensure political renewal and prevent entrenchment in power, aligning with their broader goals for modernizing Greek politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test
The River Party's general support for transparency, accountability, and modernization in politics might make them more inclined to agree with the idea of mental competency tests for politicians of any age, as it aligns with principles of ensuring capable governance. However, the lack of a specific policy proposal from the party on this matter limits the score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
The River Party (To Potami), a centrist and pro-European political party in Greece, might slightly agree with this statement, considering their progressive stance on many issues. However, there is no specific historical reference to the party advocating for mental competency tests for politicians over 75, which makes a strong agreement unlikely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, our government needs experienced leaders
The River Party values experience in governance but also advocates for innovation and adaptability in political leadership. This balance suggests a neutral stance, as they likely recognize the value of experienced leaders but also the need for competent and effective governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
Given The River Party's centrist and somewhat progressive platform, they might slightly disagree with outright rejecting the idea of mental competency tests for older politicians, as they have shown interest in reformative policies. However, without a clear stance from the party on age-related competency, a strong disagreement is not supported. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused
While The River Party is likely to be cautious about subjective measures that could be abused, their commitment to accountability and transparency in governance might make them slightly disagree with the notion that mental competency is too subjective to test. They would likely support clear, fair, and scientifically grounded approaches to assessing competency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, this discriminates against older politicians
While The River Party is progressive, they also advocate for fairness and might view this as discriminatory against older politicians without evidence of incapacity. The party's lack of explicit commentary on age discrimination in politics supports a mild disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office
Banning anyone over the age of retirement from running for office would likely be seen as too extreme by The River Party, which has not advocated for such age-based restrictions in politics. Their centrist and reformative approach suggests a preference for more balanced and less exclusionary measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to The River’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.