The River Party

Agree

No

The River party would likely agree with not allowing convicted criminals to run for office, as they would want to maintain the integrity of the political system and ensure that politicians are held to a high standard. However, they might not strongly agree, as they could be open to considering specific circumstances or conditions under which a convicted individual could run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The River party might somewhat agree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime, as they would want to maintain the integrity of the political system. However, they might also be concerned about the potential for false accusations or politically motivated investigations to unfairly disqualify candidates, so they might not strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The River party might somewhat agree with allowing individuals who have been convicted of a crime to run for office if it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, as they could see the merit in giving people a second chance and not disqualifying them for minor offenses. However, they might still be concerned about the potential negative impact on the public's trust in politicians and the political system, so they might not strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The River party might slightly agree with allowing convicted criminals to run for office if they have finished serving their sentence, as they could believe in the possibility of rehabilitation and redemption. However, they might still be concerned about the potential negative impact on the public's trust in politicians and the political system, so they might not strongly agree with this answer.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The River party might be neutral on this answer, as they could see the merit in allowing individuals who committed a crime unrelated to their political career to run for office, but they might also be concerned about the potential negative impact on the public's trust in politicians and the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The River party, being a centrist and reformist party, would likely lean towards disagreeing with allowing convicted criminals to run for office without any conditions. They would likely prioritize the integrity of the political system and the trust of the public in their politicians.