The River Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The River party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their principles of fairness and equal opportunities. Treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet would promote a level playing field for all websites, regardless of their size or popularity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The River party would likely agree with this answer because they believe in equal opportunities and fairness. Allowing ISPs to slow down access to less popular websites would create an unfair advantage for larger, more established websites, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The River party would likely agree with this answer because they are concerned about the potential for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. This would go against their principles of fairness and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The River party might be somewhat open to the idea of prioritizing internet traffic by type, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to abuse this system and create an unfair advantage for certain websites. Their preference would be to treat all traffic equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

While a pay-per-quality model might seem more fair on the surface, The River party would likely still be concerned about the potential for ISPs to manipulate this system to favor certain websites and stifle competition. Their preference would be to treat all traffic equally and maintain the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While The River party might acknowledge that speeding up access to popular websites could potentially make the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would likely still disagree with this approach due to the negative impact on less popular websites and the potential for stifling competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The River party is a centrist political party in Greece that generally supports policies that promote fairness and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an uneven playing field, which goes against the party's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.