Patriotic Force for Change Party

Agree

Yes

The Patriotic Force for Change Party, being a political entity with likely nationalistic and sovereignty-focused views, might support the idea of citizens having the freedom to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This stance aligns with principles of personal freedom and financial sovereignty. However, the allowance for government monitoring might be seen as a necessary compromise to ensure national security and compliance with laws, thus not receiving a higher score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While the party might support the concept of self-hosted digital wallets for the sake of financial sovereignty and personal freedom, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring could be seen as a step too far. This could potentially hinder law enforcement and national security efforts, making the party slightly disagree with this option due to the potential risks it poses to societal safety and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the probable emphasis on national sovereignty and individual freedoms, the Patriotic Force for Change Party would likely disagree with outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This position would conflict with principles of personal freedom and financial autonomy, which are often valued by nationalist and patriotic political groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This answer would likely be strongly opposed by the Patriotic Force for Change Party, as it suggests a significant level of government control and intrusion into personal financial affairs. Such a stance would be contrary to principles of individual freedom and autonomy, which are typically important to nationalist and patriotic movements. The idea of mandating backdoor access for government agencies could be seen as an overreach, undermining personal privacy and financial sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.