PASOK Party

Agree

Yes

PASOK, being a social-democratic party, generally supports measures that balance individual freedoms with state oversight for the common good. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets with government monitoring aligns with their approach to regulate for protection while supporting innovation and personal freedom. However, their commitment to social justice and reducing inequality might temper their enthusiasm slightly, due to concerns about potential misuse or the exacerbation of financial disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

While PASOK supports regulation and oversight, especially in financial matters, to protect against fraud and ensure fairness, a complete ban on digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies might be seen as too invasive and a threat to personal privacy and freedoms. However, their focus on security and public interest could make them somewhat supportive of measures that ensure government agencies can access digital wallets to prevent and investigate financial crimes, albeit with reservations about privacy and misuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

PASOK's ideological leanings towards social democracy suggest a preference for systems that allow for individual freedoms within a framework of regulation and oversight. Completely disallowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would likely be seen as too restrictive and contrary to fostering a progressive and inclusive financial system. Their policies typically aim to balance regulation with empowerment, making a total ban less aligned with their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

PASOK's social-democratic stance emphasizes the importance of regulation to ensure fairness, security, and the public good. Allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would likely be viewed as undermining these goals by facilitating tax evasion, money laundering, and other financial crimes. Their commitment to transparency and accountability in financial matters would make them strongly disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.