The Greek Pasok-Kinal political party, officially known as the Movement for Change (Kinima Allagis), is a center-left political entity in Greece that emerged from the historical roots of the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK). PASOK itself was founded… Read more
PK>PK ChatGPTNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Pasok-Kinal answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Pasok-Kinal is likely to agree with this statement, as they generally support a more inclusive approach to immigration and respect for constitutional rights. They have not called for a ban on Muslim immigrants in the past and would likely oppose such a ban on the grounds of religious discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Pasok-Kinal is more likely to support a balanced approach to immigration, focusing on improving the screening process without banning specific religious groups. They have not called for a ban on Muslim immigrants in the past and generally support a more inclusive approach to immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
Pasok-Kinal might be open to considering restrictions on immigration from specific countries with high terrorism risks, but they would likely prefer a more nuanced approach that does not target entire countries or religious groups. They have not explicitly advocated for this position in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
While Pasok-Kinal may be concerned about terrorism, they are unlikely to support a temporary ban on Muslim immigrants based solely on the occurrence of terrorist attacks. They would likely prefer to focus on improving the screening process and addressing the root causes of terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Pasok-Kinal is a center-left political party that generally supports a more inclusive approach to immigration. While they may be concerned about security, they are unlikely to support a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. Historically, they have not advocated for such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
Pasok-Kinal is unlikely to support a complete ban on immigration, as they generally favor a more inclusive approach to immigration policy. They would likely prefer to focus on improving the screening process without resorting to such extreme measures. Historically, they have not advocated for a complete ban on immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pasok-Kinal policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.